So, about a week ago, my dad, who has been reading science fiction since the days of "G-8 and his Flying Aces", was chatting with me (on FaceTime) about Old Man's War. He liked the beginning, didn't care much about how it developed. Speaking as an old writer himself (at 96 years old, he qualifies!) he also expressed an off-hand opinion about some of Scalzi's writerly tics, mentioning in passing "I would have liked to have edited that stuff."
Now, the odd thing (which I suspect he didn't realize) is that I happen to know the guy who actually did edit that book. (Hi,
pnh !)
And that weird interface between the "faceless editor" we can safely rail against and the person whom I had dinner with last September has come up against recently in discussions about Pope Benedict.
To my mind Pope Benedict is many overlapping people... He is the (by definition impersonal) world leader whom we can all have strong opinions about, for and against. He is also the person I saw within the place I work, still from a distance but at much closer quarters, operating within a structure that I know I've been constantly puzzled by. The Vatican is about the size of middling high school, 500 employees total, a place that sometimes can do wonderful things in an instant, while other times resisting even some of Pope's more technical (and presumably non-controversial) reforms. But Pope Benedict is also the human being to whom I gave a tour of my lab, who laughed at my jokes and told one or two of his own.
It's odd to hear criticisms about someone I have actually met. It's hard to hear; even if the criticisms are valid.
Meanwhile, I am on a speaking tour in North America and the British Isles (including a short trip to Dublin) and facing the fact that I too am both a public and a private persona. People like my talks, that's why I get to keep giving them; and they like to tell me so. But I get really uncomfortable hearing myself praised. (Not nearly as uncomfortable as when I hear myself criticized, of course!) I feel the pressure to try to live up to the absurd expectations of fans. Likewise, I feel the need to not live down to the absurd expectations of those who, often for understandable reasons, see me as a personification of institutions they have real problems with -- both Big Religion and Big Science.
And the most awkward moments can be with the people with whom I am slowly translating in role from the one (public persona) to the other (friend). I have met some celebrities of fandom and of science where I feel exhilarated to be in their presence, but not yet relaxed enough that I don't also have the fear of saying something really stupid in front of them (something I am very capable of doing, without warning). The lesson is, to be sure that when I'm on the other side of the table, I likewise also learn to give the same slack to my fans that I hope they give to me.
Now, the odd thing (which I suspect he didn't realize) is that I happen to know the guy who actually did edit that book. (Hi,
And that weird interface between the "faceless editor" we can safely rail against and the person whom I had dinner with last September has come up against recently in discussions about Pope Benedict.
To my mind Pope Benedict is many overlapping people... He is the (by definition impersonal) world leader whom we can all have strong opinions about, for and against. He is also the person I saw within the place I work, still from a distance but at much closer quarters, operating within a structure that I know I've been constantly puzzled by. The Vatican is about the size of middling high school, 500 employees total, a place that sometimes can do wonderful things in an instant, while other times resisting even some of Pope's more technical (and presumably non-controversial) reforms. But Pope Benedict is also the human being to whom I gave a tour of my lab, who laughed at my jokes and told one or two of his own.
It's odd to hear criticisms about someone I have actually met. It's hard to hear; even if the criticisms are valid.
Meanwhile, I am on a speaking tour in North America and the British Isles (including a short trip to Dublin) and facing the fact that I too am both a public and a private persona. People like my talks, that's why I get to keep giving them; and they like to tell me so. But I get really uncomfortable hearing myself praised. (Not nearly as uncomfortable as when I hear myself criticized, of course!) I feel the pressure to try to live up to the absurd expectations of fans. Likewise, I feel the need to not live down to the absurd expectations of those who, often for understandable reasons, see me as a personification of institutions they have real problems with -- both Big Religion and Big Science.
And the most awkward moments can be with the people with whom I am slowly translating in role from the one (public persona) to the other (friend). I have met some celebrities of fandom and of science where I feel exhilarated to be in their presence, but not yet relaxed enough that I don't also have the fear of saying something really stupid in front of them (something I am very capable of doing, without warning). The lesson is, to be sure that when I'm on the other side of the table, I likewise also learn to give the same slack to my fans that I hope they give to me.
- Current Location:San Francisco Airport

Comments
Yes. That.
Thank you for talking about this stuff; it's helping some pieces fit together that I've been pondering.
I think it must be so hard to be put in the place of having to deal with something out side of your field. Not even getting in to the religious aspect.
I wish you peace and strength for the events to come.
Yes; the same thing also applies to members of parties or groups. I've noticed this a lot since starting at theological college, actually. I am an Anglo-Catholic with fairly trad tastes in liturgy, and I was also a member of an undergraduate Anglican society with a bunch of "traditionalists". So I know a number of opponents of women's ordination, and some of them have been quite important in how I learned the faith, and, ironically, in how my sense of vocation emerged. So I know that they don't all have horns and a tail, and while I don't (obviously) agree with them on the question, I know that it's not a question of misogyny (it is in some cases, but not here). And I find it really hard to deal with it when my colleagues talk about them as if they were either malevolent or stupid...
And besides, having just turned 60 myself, I don't consider that old at all!
(What, you would have preferred the Sword in the Higgins, The Queen of Higgins and Darkness, The Ill-made Higgins, and the Candle in the Higgins?)
Oddly enough, working on SF cons has helped me with the awkward conversational pauses with distant relations and not just objects of my fan adoration. It's trying to come up with at least one mildly amusing anecdote or something, with pets, kids and the weather as fallback topics.
It also helps to know a little about a celebrity figure's humanity, even second- or third-hand. In that way, it's cool that you talk about having met Pope Benedict as a regular person. It's not as though he's likely to crack jokes from the pulpit, so that's a side that I for one will never see.
As a Pagan, I'm fairly likely to have a few points of disagreement with you on matters of spirituality now and again. I probably also have notions about science that you would consider inaccurate or naive, and we probably have divergent tastes in various things (being, after all, two different people). None of that does, or should, stand in the way of us being friends, or of us admiring each other for our respective strengths.
I certainly disagree quite stridently with some of Pope Benedict's opinions and beliefs. That doesn't mean I think he must be some sort of odious monster. (I reserve that assessment for Mitt Romney.)(KIDDING!) Those who get on best in the world are those who can accept and respect that each individual really is just doing the best they can with the information they have. People, as a species, love their children and want to do the right thing, however they define that. The problem is in the assumptions we make about others, not in the intentions we hold ourselves.
Thus, as Don Miguel Ruiz recommends, we should never take anything personally.
“Remember, thou too were once a neo!”
Something I tell neos to reassure them: there are two experiences which are universal here: every single person at this con was at a first con for the first time; every single person here had a very first encounter with a Big Name.
. . . and I'm just surfing for a few minutes before heading down to your performance in 45 minutes. I'll wave from the audience.
Yeah, just the broken way my mind works. FSVO 'works'.
Notice also that I won't be back there until about the time that he'll be getting ready to go back to Rome.
I'd purely hate to be as famous as Neil Gaiman or the Pope.